Fransiz filozof Paul Ricoeur’un olum yildonumu ( 20 Mayis 2005 )
“ Tarihin altinda, hafiza ve unutus. Hafiza ve unutusun altinda, yasam. / Sous l’histoire, la mémoire et l’oubli. Sous la mémoire et l’oubli, la vie. / Al di sotto della storia la memoria e l’oblio.Al di sotto della memoria e l'oblio, la vita. / Under history, memory and forgetting. Under memory and forgetting, life. ”
" Olay kavrami gibi tarihsel zamanin mimarisi kavrami da tarihin butunsel zamaninin ayrismasi sayesinde elde edilir. Bu ayrisma da farkli yerel zamanlar arasindaki iliskiler sorununu dogurur. Peki cucelerin bakisinin ' keskinligini ' bunlari omuzlarinda tasiyan devlerin ' buyukluguyle ' karsilastiran Bernard of Chartres gibi konusmayi artik biraktik mi ? Ronesans zamanlarini karanlik caglarla karailastirmaktan, bazi dongusel olgularin kaydettigi salinimlari gozetlemekten, ilerlemeleri ve gerilemeleri belirlemekten, kaynaklara donmeyi ovmekten, tarihin birikimsel etkilerini zevklerin ve adetlerin bozulmasindan korumaktan vaz mi gectik ? Artik eskiler-modemler tartismasi yapmiyor muyuz? Vico ve Turgot'yu okumuyor ve anlamiyor muyuz ? "
" Like the notion of event, that of the architecture of historical time is conquered through the disintegration of the overall time of history, from which emerges the problem of the relationships between different local times. But have we stopped adding to proposals of the type that Bernard of Chartres spoke of in talking about the ' visual acuity ' of dwarfs in comparison to the ' greatness ' of the giants upon whose shoulders they were perched? Have we renounced opposing a time of rebirth to one of darkness, spotting oscillations indicated by some cyclical phenomena, watching out for advances and retreats, extolling the return to sources, protecting taste and customs from the corruption of the cumulative effects of history ? Are there no more battles between the Ancients and the Moderns ? Haven’t we read and understood Vico and Turgot ? "



Alıntı yaparak yanıtla




Yer İmleri