Aadaki chart ve reel piyasann (tesla, paypal, master card, emeklilik/yatrm fonlar vs) yava yava coine ynelmesini dikkate aldmda, altn yatrmcs olarak, dndm dnm iindeysek, iim rperiyor (ya evde yoksan) .
Yeni ye
Aadaki chart ve reel piyasann (tesla, paypal, master card, emeklilik/yatrm fonlar vs) yava yava coine ynelmesini dikkate aldmda, altn yatrmcs olarak, dndm dnm iindeysek, iim rperiyor (ya evde yoksan) .
Bronz ye
Ben salt verilere bakarm. Yllarca altn tuttum ama Onsu 2000 lerde vedalatm nk oyunu grdm. Yine de Risk ynetimi iin mecburen bir miktar altn tutuyorum portfymde Merkez bankalar nasl eitleme yapyorsa ben de o mantkla yapyorum. Fed Dolar tarihi boyunca hibir dneminde bu kadar para basmamken merkez bankalarn matbaalar gn ar alp printerla kat para basyorken altnn en ufak tepki vermemesi ve hatta ons altnn dmesi amalarna ulatklar anlamna gelir. 1970 lerden ders aldklar iin bitcoin denen zmbrtya izin veriyorlar. nk 1970'lerin sonunda buna benzer durumda altn %1000 civarnda art gstermiti. Yine yle bir ey olmasndan korktular ve o yzdendir ki bitcoine izin verdiler ve de baarl oldular... Neticede Altnn karizmas maalesef maniplasyonla da olsa izildi.Originally Posted by Patrick Bateman
Son dzenleme : vivatrader; 13-04-2021 saat: 11:48.
First of all, never play macho man with the market. Second, never overtrade. Paul Tudor Jones
Bronz ye
Elon musk bitcoinin speklatr ve hatta kanmca kurucusu olan satoshi denen kii elon musk'n ta kendisidir. . O kendine verilen rol oynuyor. Ergen tayfay gazlamak ve idol olmak iin kendine biilen rol oynuyor. Ot ekip resmini paylamalar, anarko tavrlar, gizemli ve szm ona sistem kart havalarla ergenlerin speklatrln yapyor. Ergenler sever bu tipleri..elon musk da bu isiz gsz eitmsiz cahil cuhela grubunda .
bu satoshi denen adamm kadn m her kimse. nceki meslei svacym.
zetle Elon musk sistem kart deil sitemin adamdr. Ona biilen rol sistem kartlarnn altn ve gme kaymasn engellemektir. Dikkat ederseniz 'Game Stop' vakasnda topluluk tam gme yneliyorken ve gmte kresel apta trend balatacakken olay bir anda saptrp tam da o gn twitter biosuna bitcoin hasthagi yazp dogcoin vb kanallara kitleyi kanalize etti ve gmn ykseliini bir anda engelledi. Halbuki Redditiler tm dnyada o gn gm hareketini balatacakt Elon Musk gm olayn daha balamadan bitirdi. O dakikada kime hizmet ettii belli olmutu zaten...
Son dzenleme : vivatrader; 13-04-2021 saat: 12:14.
First of all, never play macho man with the market. Second, never overtrade. Paul Tudor Jones
ye
twitter'dan alnt iki grafik. gram tl grafie gre, getiimiz sonbaharda grdmz 540 lar zirveydi. yine de de direndi.
dier grafik ons, logaritmik, baya uzun vadeli. onda da yukarya ok fazla marj yok gibi. grafikten st trend izgisi kaa geliyor grnmyor ama, yukarya ok marj yok gibi. 4 - 5 bin gibi biryere denk geliyor sanrm st trend
yani salt grafiklere baklrsa, gram'da yukarda 550 bilemedin 600 zirve. ons'da da yle uacak frlayacak kadar marj yok
bu grafikler twitter'dan alntdr, yanl olabilir, tavsiye deildir, ben de amatrm ve zarardaym. tavsiye olarak almayn
tavsiye deildir
Gm ye
Bitcoin ilk olarak 1988 ylnda satanistlerin dergisi olan THE ECONOMIST te ilan edildi. Mehur Phoenix kuu paralar eziyordu yakyordu. Makalenin orjinalini paylayorum. Bitcoin in bamsz devam etmesi mmkn deil. Bunlar bamsz paraya veya sisteme asla izin vermezler. u anda yaplan deney tek dnya devletine gei yapmadan nce insanlar a pasaportuna, srekli a olmann zorunlu olduuna, ip takmann faydal bir ey olduuna, dijital parann iyi bir ey olduuna inandrma ara aamalar.
nsanlar eer tuzaa derse sonu Smer Tabletlerinde yazan Enki olayna benzer bir klelik sreci yaayacaz ve THE MATRIX sistemi kurulacak. 300 ler Komitesi kitabn mutlaka okuyun. Oradaki komplolar bugn birer birer gerek oluyor. u anda Microsoft Amazon Google ve Apple tm dnyay kontrol edecek Bulut veri merkezlerini kurdular. Buluta gemeyen firma kalmyor. Sosyal medya kullanmayan insan kalmyor. Geriye a pasaportu, vcuda entegre edilecek mikroip ve blockchain tabanl ama merkezin kontrol ettii bir IMFCOIN benzeri dijital para kalyor. TESLA da uydularn gnderdi ve Internetin kopmasn engelleyecek yaplar oluturuyor. Tek risk gne patlamas ile dijital verilerin silinmesi. Onun iin de Bill Gates haziran aynda Stanford niversitesi ile birlikte atmosfere tebeir tozu serpecek.
Yani bitcoin u bu falan altn gm bilmemne bir sre sonra hibir anlam ifade etmeyebilir. nsanln topyekn satanistlere kle olduu bir srece doru gidiyoruz. zgrlk yoksa parann ne nemi var?
kaynak: https://www.economist.com/finance-an...orld-one-moneyOne world, one money
A global currency is not a new idea, but it may soon get a new lease of life
Finance & economics
Sep 26th 1998 edition
Sep 24th 1998
IN DIFFICULT times, people are allowed, even encouraged, to think the unthinkable. Some of the economists who propose capital controls as a remedy for recession in Asia claim to be doing this—but they are flattering themselves. Unthinkable? Malaysia just did it. Dozens of countries still use capital-account restrictions. And it is a clich of the orthodox “sequencing” literature that a variety of such controls should be retained until other reforms are complete. Really, to think the unthinkable, you have to be bolder than this.
So here is an idea: global currency union. Let nobody call it boringly feasible, or politically expedient. Yet, like all the best unthinkable ideas, it has more going for it than you might think—in principle, at least. The idea is not new. Richard Cooper of Harvard University proposed a single world currency in Foreign Affairs in 1984, and he was not the first to think of it. It seemed an outlandish idea, and still does. But much has happened lately to make it worth a moment's thought.
The usual way to ask whether countries would be better off sharing a single currency—that is, whether they constitute an “optimal currency area”—is to examine the following trade-off. On one side is the undoubted convenience of a single money as a lubricant for trade and cross-border investment. On the other is the loss of the exchange rate as a shock-absorber for times when one or more of the countries face pressures (an abrupt fall in demand for their exports, say, or a sudden rise in labour costs) that the others are spared—a so-called “asymmetric shock”.
In setting cost against benefit, again according to the standard view, the crucial factors are openness to trade and freedom of movement of factors of production. A small open economy has more to gain from the convenience provided by a single currency. On the other hand, if labour (especially) is reluctant to migrate, the need for the exchange-rate shock-absorber is all the greater. Weighing all this, most economists conclude that the 11 countries that are about to adopt the euro are not in fact an optimal currency area. The world as a whole is not even close.
So what has changed? The main thing is the current global emergency. This is so serious a crisis that it is likely to prove a paradigm-shifting event, though straws were in the wind already. The emerging-market disaster poses the question, How is the world to live with globally integrated finance? In addition, it casts doubt on what once seemed a good answer: that floating exchange rates are the best way to stabilise the world economy.
Shockingly unstable
According to the traditional model, a country with unduly high labour costs, and therefore a troublesome current-account deficit, could expect to see its currency depreciate; this would cut real wages, making imports dearer and exports cheaper, thus neatly restoring the economy to equilibrium. But in a world where international flows of capital overwhelm international flows of trade, this does not work. Floating exchange rates destabilise trade and investment by wrenching relative prices away from their fundamental values (that is, from the values that would put the corresponding exchange rates at purchasing-power parity). In the emerging-markets crisis that currently threatens the world economy, exchange-rate movements have not been absorbers of shocks but amplifiers and even creators of them.
Governments of small open economies have long known that it is not an option to “leave the exchange rate to the market”. Monetary policy must always keep at least one eye on the currency. But governments have also learnt, in a second big change, that intermediate exchange-rate regimes do not work either. That was the lesson of the European Monetary System debacle of 1992-93 (and, arguably, of the downfall of the pegged-but-adjustable regimes used in Asia until last year). Semi-fixed systems cannot withstand the assault of integrated capital markets: they are prone to self-fulfilling panics. In other words, they too are destabilising.
But what does that leave? Let's see. Pure floating is no use. Semi-fixed is no use. So there are two possibilities. One is to turn back the clock on financial integration: then pure-floating or semi-fixed systems might once again be used successfully. That would be enormously costly, especially to the developing countries; and it would be very difficult, because integration is partly driven by technological progress, which is hard to reverse. Still, it is a fair bet that a lot of countries will follow Malaysia's example and give it a try. Otherwise, it seems, the remaining course is to combine increasing integration with perfect fixity of exchange rates—meaning currency union.
The fashion for currency boards reflects some of this thinking. Exchange-rate flexibility is more trouble than it is worth, advocates say, so abandon it once and for all. Alas, currency boards suffer big drawbacks all of their own. Whereas a currency union has a central bank to act as lender of last resort, a country with a currency board does not. So these regimes are vulnerable to runs on banks. Currency boards are a poor test of the larger idea.
The all-or-nothing, float-or-merge analysis also provides the case in economic logic for the euro: strive for integration, it says, no holds barred. Unfortunately, EMU is a somewhat flawed test as well. It is a political project as much as an economic one, so it will not reveal everything about how well a currency union among independent nation states might work. But it will reveal a lot, and its symbolic importance will be immense. If it fails, not only will that cause enormous political harm to the European Union, but the pressure for global financial barriers will be greatly strengthened. If it succeeds, the case for a global currency union will seem much more interesting.
Fine, you say, but how would the world ever get from here to there? Hard to say, admittedly. Find the answer to that and the idea would be thinkable.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "One world, one money"
[IMG]https://miro.medium.com/max/840/1*JC3mLobTdA63mR96_lMdDg.png[/IMG]Aadaki chart ve reel piyasann (tesla, paypal, master card, emeklilik/yatrm fonlar vs) yava yava coine ynelmesini dikkate aldmda, altn yatrmcs olarak, dndm dnm iindeysek, iim rperiyor (ya evde yoksan) .
Bronz ye
Slot makinelerinin kazanma sesini sk sk tavan hoparlrlerinden verirler.
Millet de sanr ki "aaa bakalar akr akr srekli kazanyor, heralde birazdan ben de kazanrm"
Evi tutarken herkes iyidir. Yeni kirac adaynz iyi birine benziyor olsa da, imza tarihi kontrat tarihinden 15 gn sonras olacak ekilde CEZALI TAHLYE TAAHHTNAMES imzalatn.
lgili video > https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fk69vY25PoQ
Altn ye
Elon musk btcoin dedii iin gm basklanmad,redditcilerin gaz verdii gn 30 dolara varan gm fiyatn bir gecede kat piyasada dnyada yllk retilen gmn 2 kat bir ka saat iinde kat stnde satld iin gmn hareketi baskland.Ama hareket basklanamad basklanamaz.Millet u anda etf lerden kyor,altn gm etf leri azalyor millet satyor ondan azalyor diye gaz veriliyor,halbuki millet akn akn fizikiye geiyor.Zengini fakiri merkez bankas tm dnyada akll para akn akn fiziki altn gme geiyor.Kanlmaz son yaknda.Altn gm gerek en gvenilir paradr.Herkes de buna gre davranyor.Fiziki suni basklanm fiyatlar manasz.Piyasada ka ay geti hala fiziki ve sanal gm fiyatlar arasndaki inanlmaz fark kapanmad.En salak yatrmc bile amerikada ulan ben bunu sanaldan ekeyim reelde sataym der,bu dalgaya nasl dayanacaklar mmkn m.
Altn ye
in ilginci kk yatrmc amerikada fiziki sat asla yapmyor.Neyi bekliyorlar niye satmyorlar.
Gnderi Kurallar
Alnt yaparak yantla
Yer mleri